Carol A. Greene
Judge, Superior Court of California, County of Riverside 2019–
C-
62% — 10 of 16 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 54% of 312 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
27cases reviewed on appeal
35%reversed, in whole or part, of 23 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 15 reversed 6 dismissed 3 reversed in part 2 writ denied 1
Areas
By year: 2024 10 · 2025 6 · 2023 6 · 2022 3 · 2026 2 ·
Analysis
17reviewed cases analysed
54rulings read
0rulings where the model disagrees with the court
2cases with a verified missed authority
0appellate opinions called questionable
Counts of a model's readings across this judge's reviewed cases, each shown on its case page beside the court's disposition. Not a finding about the judge.
Cases
- Tye v. Tye CA4/2
- Tye v. Tye CA4/2
- SeneMan v. Corona Industrial JV CA4/1
- Pickard v. Riverside Community Hospital CA4/2
- Mejia v. Mares CA4/2
- Tilden v. OCR-GP CA4/1
- Drury v. Ryan
- Kerin v. Superior Court CA4/2
- Nelson v. Eastern Municipal Water District CA4/1
- Bartlett v. Ahmad CA4/1
- Mesquite Country Club etc. v. Save Oswit Canyon CA4/1
- Tye v. Tye CA4/2
- Tye v. Tye CA4/2
- Mays v. Oakview Homeowners Association CA4/1
- George v. Ingram Micro Services CA4/1
- Mesquite Country Club Condominium Homeowners etc. v. Save Oswit Canyon CA4/1
- Quigley v. Bis Club & Bar CA4/1
- Stani v. Shamrock Foods CA4/2
- Stingl v. Berman CA4/3
- Roger v. County of Riverside CA4/2
- Doby v. City of Lake Elsinore CA4/3
- Fitness International v. Cole LA Riverside CA CA4/3
- Lopez v. Pacific Dental Services CA4/2
- Gonzales v. Superior Court CA4/2
- Tye v. Escrow CA4/2