Buchanan
D+
98% — 360.0 of 368 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 65% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- In re B.Y. CA4/1
- People v. Montelongo CA4/1
- People v. Markley CA4/1
- Pickens v. County of Riverside CA4/1
- In re B.W. CA4/1
- People v. Day CA4/1
- People v. Gonzalez-Buttner CA4/1
- Herron v. Feast and Fareway CA4/1
- In re E.M. CA4/1
- People v. Joyce CA4/1
- People v. Suarez CA4/1
- C.S. v. Gentry CA4/1
- Martin v. National Autopsy Experts, LLC CA4/1
- People v. Flores CA4/1
- Romero v. American Multi-Cinema, Inc. CA4/1
- People v. Ledon CA4/1
- People v. Parson CA4/1
- In re E.B. CA4/1
- Barber v. Select Portfolio Servicing CA4/1
- People v. Williams CA4/1
- Michael M. v. Robin J. CA4/1
- People v. Sherman
- People v. Filares CA4/1
- In re Z.T. CA4/1
- People v. Abiel CA4/1