Buchanan
D+
98% — 360.0 of 368 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 65% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- People v. Porter CA4/1
- Marriage of Guldseth CA4/1
- People v. Williams CA4/1
- Calexico Unified School Dist. v. City of Calexico CA4/1
- Peppertree Villages v. Lounsbery Ferguson Altona & Peak CA4/1
- Simmons v. EHM Architecture CA4/1
- People v. Berry-Vierwinden
- Young v. Axos Financial CA4/1
- People v. Alfaro CA4/1
- People v. Bolden CA4/1
- VCA Animal Hospitals v. Hampel CA4/1
- Larsen v. Sacor Financial CA4/1
- People v. Soltero CA4/1
- Vulcan Lands, Inc. v. Victoria Older Currier
- People v. Davila CA4/1
- People v. Ohlinger CA4/1
- Seeley v. Rook CA4/1
- In re S.O. CA4/1
- People v. Tolentino CA4/1
- Palomar Health v. Nat. Nurses United
- People v. Rocha CA4/1
- In re A.O. CA4/1
- Memula v. Mojave Radiation Oncology Medical Group CA4/1
- People v. Hatfield CA4/1
- In re S.A. CA4/1