Bryan
A-
provisional — 100% — 1.0 of 1 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 1 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Utility Consumers' Action Network v. Sprint Solutions, Inc.
- Dopman v. Hoberlin
- Whitney v. Flint
- People v. March
- Soule v. Steamboat Pike
- Haight v. Kary
- Dollarhide v. Thorne
- Bryant v. Benicia Flouring Co.
- Blood v. Pixley
- Landsberger v. Gorham
- Hill v. Newman
- Morgan v. Hugg
- Guy v. Middleton
- Deuprez v. Deuprez
- People ex rel. Attorney General v. Gerke
- People v. Littlefield
- People v. Reyes
- Sanford v. Head
- Tomlinson v. Spencer
- Evoy v. Tewksbury
- Moffatt v. Moffatt
- Coit v. Humbert
- Mulliken v. Asa Hull & Co.
- Ritchie, Osgood & Co. v. Bradshaw & Co.
- Bowles v. Sacramento Turnpike