Issac S. Belcher
Justice, Court of Appeal · Supreme Court of California · 1872–1898
Judge, California Supreme Court 1872–1874
840panels sat on (not as author)
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Benham v. Connor No. 15898 · 1896-06-05 · civil
- Hellman v. Merz L. A. No. 55 · 1896-05-21 · civil
- Randol v. Rowe S. F. No. 33 · 1896-05-19 · civil · affirmed
- Tate v. Fratt Sac. No. 28 · 1896-05-13 · civil
- Spooner v. Cady Sac. No. 36 · 1896-05-08 · civil · modified
- Sutton v. Nicolaisen Sac. No. 56 · 1896-05-01 · civil · affirmed
- In re the Estate of McKinney Sac. No. 48 · 1896-04-16 · probate
- People v. Smith Crim. No. 86 · 1896-04-10 · criminal
- Ellis v. Tulare County Sac. No. 70 · 1896-04-07 · civil · affirmed
- Consolidated National Bank v. Hayes L. A. No. 57 · 1896-03-24 · civil
- Dunn v. Price L. A. No. 82 · 1896-03-24 · civil
- O'Conor v. Morse L. A. No. 96 · 1896-03-24 · civil
- Susskind v. Hall L. A. No. 33 · 1896-03-23 · civil · reversed
- Fatjo v. Swasey S. F. No. 53 · 1896-03-21 · probate
- Rogers v. Schulenburg L. A. No. 7 · 1896-02-20 · civil
- Peterson v. Machado No. 19,591 · 1896-02-07 · civil · affirmed
- Santa Cruz Rock Paving Co. v. Lyons No. 15,760 · 1896-01-31 · civil · affirmed
- Smith v. Sabin No. 16,014 · 1896-01-30 · civil · affirmed
- McGowan v. McDonald No. 16034 · 1896-01-02 · civil
- Northey v. Bankers' Life Ass'n No. 15983 · 1895-12-23 · civil
- Stimson Mill Co. v. Riley L. A. No. 3 · 1895-12-20 · civil · affirmed
- Mutter v. I. X. L. Lime Co. No. 15,891 · 1895-12-20 · civil · reversed
- Connors v. Secord S. F. No. 4 · 1895-12-13 · probate
- Fogel v. San Francisco & San Mateo Railway Co. No. 16,011 · 1895-11-25 · civil · affirmed
- County of Siskiyou v. Gamlich No. 18337 · 1895-11-18 · civil