
Barry T. Moskowitz
Judge, District Court, S.D. California 1995–
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b's verdicts on a court's own orders matched a later appeal 76% of the time (104 of 136), graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 62 reversed 8 remanded 4 reversed in part 3 dismissed 3
The Ninth Circuit's later rulings on their dockets
affirmed 5 dismissed 2 vacated 1
Each Ninth Circuit opinion that names a docket this judge wrote an order on, by its outcome; the ruling it reviewed is not always the order in the record. The order's page links the opinion.
Areas
civil 46 criminal 43 probate 1
By year: 2007 8 · 2020 7 · 2019 7 · 2005 7 · 1997 7 · 2010 6 · 1998 6 · 2011 5 · 2009 5 · 2024 4 · 2014 4 · 2008 4 · 2023 3 · 2026 2 · 2025 2 · 2022 2 · 2021 2 · 2012 2 · 2000 2 · 2016 1 · 2006 1 · 2003 1 · 2001 1 · 1999 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Youngevity International, Corp. v. Smith
- Smart-Tek Services, Inc. v. Irs
- In Re Regulus Therapeutics Inc. Securities Litigation
- Odyssey Reinsurance Company v. Nagby
- Arellano v. Santos
- Tattersalls LTD. v. Wiener
- Chelberg v. Williams
- Vickrey v. Internal Revenue Service
- Contreras-Ramirez v. United States
- Odyssey Reinsurance Company v. Knight Insurance Company, Ltd.
- Kevin Jones v. Richard Donovan
- Bogarin v. Hatton
- American Airlines, Inc. v. Robert Mawhinney
- Amparan v. Spearman
- Rosanne State v. Adolpho Gonzales
- Motlagh v. Qatar Airways, Q.C.S.C.
- Youngevity International, Corp. v. Smith
- Moriarty v. American General Life Insurance Company
- Youngevity International, Corp. v. Smith
- Huynh v. Lizarraga
- Arellano v. Santos
- Youngevity International, Corp. v. Smith
- Tattersalls LTD. v. Wiener
- Mirchandani v. BMO Harris Bank
- Contreras v. Montgomery