Andrew G. Schopler
, District Court, S.D. California 2016–
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b's verdicts on a court's own orders matched a later appeal 76% of the time (104 of 136), graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 12 vacated 1 dismissed 1
The Ninth Circuit's later rulings on their dockets
affirmed 10 remanded 1 dismissed 1
Each Ninth Circuit opinion that names a docket this judge wrote an order on, by its outcome; the ruling it reviewed is not always the order in the record. The order's page links the opinion.
Areas
By year: 2025 12 · 2026 2 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Emert v. Schuck
- Shallowhorn v. Lopez
- Jones v. Appellate Defenders Inc.
- Bonilla v. Imperial, San Diego, and Alameda County Superior Courts
- Ramirez v. Pratt
- Rodriguez v. Equal Exchange, Inc.
- Topete-Jasper v. Kijakazi
- Nelson v. Guardian Towing, Inc
- Fay v. Associated Industries Insurance Company, Inc.
- Gonzalez v. Sedighi
- Adams v. Grossmont Cuyamaca Community College District
- George v. Grossmont Cuyamaca Community College District Board Of Governors
- 3D Systems, Inc. v. Wynne
- 3D Systems, Inc. v. Wynne
- Hudson v. Simon
- 3D Systems, Inc. v. Wynne
- Franklin v. Healthsource Global Staffing, Inc.
- Frady v. New Peaks LLC.
- Doe v. County of San Diego
- Alexander v. Social Security Administration
- Rosales v. The Roman Catholic Bishop of San Diego
- Hearn v. Warden
- Beck v. Superior Court of California, County of Orange
- Justin S. Beck v. State of California
- Beck v. Catanzarite Law Corporation