Amy D. Hogue
Judge, Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles 2002–
73cases reviewed on appeal
30%reversed, in whole or part, of 70 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 47 reversed 16 reversed in part 4 modified 2 writ granted 1 vacated 1 other 1 dismissed 1
Areas
civil 68 criminal 2 probate 1 family 1 dependency 1
By year: 2019 11 · 2014 10 · 2015 9 · 2013 8 · 2021 6 · 2023 5 · 2020 5 · 2016 5 · 2018 4 · 2025 3 · 2017 3 · 2024 2 · 2022 2 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Bradsbery v. Vicar Operating
- Bradsbery v. Vicar Operating, Inc.
- Bradsbery v. Vicar Operating, Inc.
- Boermeester v. Carry
- Boermeester v. Carry
- Schwade v. South Pasadena Rehabilitation Center CA2/2
- Sepanossian v. Nat. Ready Mix Co.
- Perez v. California Herbal Remedies CA2/4
- Schwade v. South Pasadena Rehabilitation Center LLC CA2/2
- Spencer v. City of Palos Verdes Estates
- Mills v. Facility Solutions Group
- Barber v. Southern Cal. Edison Co.
- Dept. of Fair Employment and Housing v. M&N Financing Corp.
- Nixon v. AmeriHome Mortgage Co., LLC
- Rosales v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
- Heinz v. Cal. Public Employees' Retirement System CA2/7
- Melamed v. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center CA2/1
- Orantes v. Westlake Wellbeing Properties CA2/5
- Marchetti v. Ford of Simi Valley, Inc. CA2/1
- IV Solutions v. Cal. Board of Pharmacy CA2/4
- T.T. v. Cal. Dept. of Social Services CA2/3
- Boermeester v. Carry
- Boermeester v. Carry
- Gonzalez v. City of Los Angeles
- Tulare Pediatric Health etc. v. State Dept. of Health Care etc.