Allison H. Goddard
, District Court, S.D. California 2019–
B-
100% — 499.0 of 501 orders sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 34% of 51 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b's verdicts on a court's own orders matched a later appeal 76% of the time (104 of 136), graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
The Ninth Circuit's later rulings on their dockets
affirmed 14 reversed in part 1
Each Ninth Circuit opinion that names a docket this judge wrote an order on, by its outcome; the ruling it reviewed is not always the order in the record. The order's page links the opinion.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Strojnik v. Torrey Pines Club Corporation
- Celgene Corporation v. Hetero Labs Limited
- The Scripps Research Institute v. Cempra Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- Price v. La Mesa, City of
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Champion-Cain
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Champion-Cain
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Champion-Cain
- R.N. v. United States of America
- Pinto v. CBE Group, Inc.
- Anokiwave, Inc. v. Rebeiz
- Mathewson v. Saul
- Cavada v. Inter-Continental Hotels Group, Inc.
- Donahue v. Saul
- Padilla v. United States of America
- Williams v. Rucker
- Bolden v. Peraza
- Villegas v. Saul
- Donahue v. Saul
- Price v. La Mesa, City of
- (PC) Bradford v. Khamooshian
- Raya v. Calbiotech
- Amaraut v. Sprint/United Management Company
- Collier v. Eagle Recovery Associates, Inc.
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Champion-Cain