gno.law

Jackson v. RJ Donovan

District Court, S.D. California · 3:23-cv-01826 · 2023-10-12 · Unknown

Proceeding
district
Area
civil
Panel
Ruth Bermudez Montenegro (author)

Analysis

A model's reading — qwen3.8-27b, prompt own-v1, 2026-10-13T21:48Z · confidence high

The court reviewed a civil action filed by a pro se prisoner who had not paid the required filing fee or requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The court dismissed the action without prejudice and granted the plaintiff 45 days to pay the fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis.

What the court decidedThe model
Dismissal of civil action without prejudice
“Accordingly, the Court (1) DISMISSES this civil action without prejudice based on Plaintiff’s failure to pay the $402 civil filing and administrative fee or submit a Motion to Proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) and § 1915(a)”
agree with court
The dismissal is procedurally correct because 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) mandates payment of the filing fee, and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) provides the only statutory exception (IFP status). Since the plaintiff did neither, the court lacked jurisdiction to proceed on the merits. Dismissing without prejudice is the standard remedy to allow the plaintiff to cure the defect.
Grant of 45 days to reopen case
“GRANTS Plaintiff forty-five (45) days leave from the date this Order is filed to re-open the case by either (a) paying the entire $402 civil filing and administrative fee in full or (b) completing and filing a Motion to Proceed IFP”
agree with court
Granting a specific period to cure a procedural defect (failure to pay fees) is within the court's discretion and promotes access to the courts, particularly for pro se litigants. The requirement for a certified trust account statement aligns with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) for prisoner IFP motions.

The order itself: sound — The order correctly identifies the statutory requirements for filing fees and IFP status. It accurately applies the law to the facts (plaintiff paid no fee and filed no IFP motion) and provides a clear, standard remedy (dismissal without prejudice with a deadline to cure). The citations are appropriate and directly support the procedural ruling.

How this analysis was made · dispute it

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 TYIAVORY JACKSON, Case No.: 3:23-CV-01826-RBM-AHG CDCR No. V-84091, 11 ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL Plaintiff, 12 ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE vs. FOR FAILING TO PAY 13 FILING FEE REQUIRED 14 BY 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) AND/OR R.J. DONOVAN, FAILING TO MOVE TO PROCEED 15 Defendants. IN FORMA PAUPERIS 16 PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) 17 19 Plaintiff Tyiavory Jackson (“Plaintiff” or “Jackson”), proceeding pro se and 20 currently housed at R.J. Donovan State Prison (“RJD”) in San Diego, California, has filed 21 this civil action. (Doc. 1.) 22 FAILURE TO PAY FILING FEE OR REQUEST IFP STATUS 23 All parties instituting any civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the 24 United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of 25 26 27 28 1 $402. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed despite a failure to pay the entire 2 fee only if the plaintiff is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 3 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1051 (9th Cir. 2007); 4 Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). However, if the plaintiff is a 5 prisoner, and even if he is granted leave to proceed IFP, he remains obligated to pay the 6 entire filing fee in “increments,” see Williams v. Paramo, 775 F.3d 1182, 1185 (9th Cir. 7 2015), regardless of whether his case is ultimately dismissed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) 8 & (2); Taylor v. Delatoore, 281 F.3d 844, 847 (9th Cir. 2002). 9 Jackson has not paid the $402 in filing and administrative fees required to commence 10 a civil action in federal court and has not requested leave to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 11 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Therefore, his case cannot yet proceed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); 12 Andrews, 493 F.3d at 1051. 13 CONCLUSION 14 Accordingly, the Court (1) DISMISSES this civil action without prejudice based on 15 Plaintiff’s failure to pay the $402 civil filing and administrative fee or submit a Motion to 16 Proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) and § 1915(a) and (2) GRANTS Plaintiff 17 forty-five (45) days leave from the date this Order is filed to re-open the case by either (a) 18 paying the entire $402 civil filing and administrative fee in full or (b) completing and filing 19 a Motion to Proceed IFP, which requires a certified copy of his trust account statement for 20 the 6-month period preceding the filing of his Complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). 21 In light of Jackson’s incarceration, the Court further DIRECTS the Clerk of the 22 Court to provide him with its approved form “Motion and Declaration in Support of Motion 23 to Proceed In Forma Pauperis.” If Jackson fails to either prepay the $402 civil filing fee 24 25 26 1 In addition to the $350 statutory fee, civil litigants must pay an additional administrative 27 fee of $52. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) (Judicial Conference Schedule of Fees, District Court Misc. Fee Schedule, § 14 (eff. Dec. 1, 2020)). The additional $52 administrative fee does 28 1 || or complete and file the enclosed Motion to Proceed IFP with the Clerk within 45 days, his 2 will remain dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) and without 3 || further Order of the Court. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 || Dated: October 12, 2023 9 United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Cites, in this corpus