Casey v. Reaud
- Proceeding
- district
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Gonzalo P. Curiel (author)
Analysis
The court reviewed a pro se civil rights complaint filed by a prisoner who had not paid the required filing fee or filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The court dismissed the action without prejudice and granted the plaintiff 45 days to pay the fee or file a proper IFP motion.
| What the court decided | The model |
|---|---|
Dismissal of the civil action without prejudice for failure to pay filing fees or request IFP status“DISMISSES this action sua sponte without prejudice for failure to pay the $400 civil filing and administrative fee or to submit a Motion to Proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a) and 1915(a)” | agree with court The dismissal is procedurally correct under 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) and § 1915(a), which require payment of fees or a grant of IFP status before a civil action can proceed. The court correctly identified that the plaintiff failed to meet these prerequisites. The dismissal is without prejudice, allowing the plaintiff to cure the defect, which is the standard remedy in such situations. |
Granting of 45 days leave to pay fees or file IFP motion“GRANTS Plaintiff forty-five (45) days leave from the date this Order is filed to: (a) prepay the entire $402 civil filing and administrative fee in full; or (b) complete and file a Motion to Proceed IFP” | agree with court Granting a reasonable period to cure a procedural defect before final dismissal is consistent with judicial practice and the purpose of the IFP statutes. The 45-day period is reasonable and provides the plaintiff an opportunity to comply with the law. |
The order itself: sound — The order correctly applies the statutory requirements for filing fees and IFP status. It cites the relevant Ninth Circuit precedent and local rules. The reasoning is straightforward and directly addresses the procedural defect. There are no significant gaps or errors in the application of the law.
How this analysis was made · dispute it
inconsistent with cited authorityOpinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DOUGLAS K. CASEY, Case No.: 3:23-cv-1439-GPC-SBC BOP #35005510, 12 ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL Plaintiff, 13 ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PAY vs. FILING FEES REQUIRED BY 14 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) WAYNE REAUD, CENTRAL 15 INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, FEDERAL 16 BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, et al, 17 Defendants. 18 19 Douglas K. Casey (“Plaintiff”), an inmate proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights 20 complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, along with a letter and “supplemental document.” 21 See ECF Nos. 1–5. Plaintiff has not prepaid the $402 civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. 22 § 1914(a), however, and has not filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) 23 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). 24 I. Failure to Pay Filing Fee or Request IFP Status 25 All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the 26 United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of 27 $402. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed despite a plaintiff’s failure to prepay 28 the entire fee only if he is granted leave to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). 1 See Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1051 (9th Cir. 2007); Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 2 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). However, if the Plaintiff is a prisoner, and even if he is 3 granted leave to commence his suit IFP, he remains obligated to pay the entire filing fee in 4 “increments,” see Williams v. Paramo, 775 F.3d 1182, 1185 (9th Cir. 2015), regardless of 5 whether his case is ultimately dismissed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) & (2); Taylor v. 6 Delatoore, 281 F.3d 844, 847 (9th Cir. 2002). 7 Plaintiff has not prepaid the $402 in filing and administrative fees required to 8 commence this civil action, nor has he submitted a properly supported Motion to Proceed 9 IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).1 Therefore, his case cannot yet proceed. See 28 U.S.C. 10 § 1914(a); Andrews, 493 F.3d at 1051. 11 II. Conclusion and Order 12 For the reasons set forth above, the Court hereby: 13 (1) DISMISSES this action sua sponte without prejudice for failure to pay the 14 $400 civil filing and administrative fee or to submit a Motion to Proceed IFP pursuant to 15 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a) and 1915(a); and 16 (2) GRANTS Plaintiff forty-five (45) days leave from the date this Order is filed 17 to: (a) prepay the entire $402 civil filing and administrative fee in full; or (b) complete and 18 file a Motion to Proceed IFP which includes a certified copy of his trust account statement 19 for the 6-month period preceding the filing of his Complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2); 20 S.D. Cal. CivLR 3.2(b). 21 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall provide Plaintiff 22 with this Court’s approved form “Motion and Declaration in Support of Motion to Proceed 23 In Forma Pauperis.” If Plaintiff fails to either prepay the $402 civil filing fee or complete 24 and submit the enclosed Motion to Proceed IFP within 45 days, this action will remain 25 26 1 In addition to the $350 statutory fee, civil litigants must pay an additional administrative fee of 27 $52. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); Judicial Conference Schedule of Fees, District Court Misc. Fee Schedule, § 14 (eff. Dec. 1, 2020). The additional $52 administrative fee does not apply to persons 28 1 || dismissed without prejudice based on Plaintiff's failure to satisfy 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a)’s fee 2 requirements and without further Order of the Court. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 ||Dated: August 17, 2023 □□ 5 Cor athe Cade 6 United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3
Cites, in this corpus
- Lonnie Williams, Jr. v. Daniel Paramo 13-56004 · 2015-01-07