gno.law

Allen v. Diaz

District Court, S.D. California · 3:20-cv-01389 · 2023-04-07 · Unknown

Proceeding
district
Area
civil
Panel
Lupe Rodriguez (author)

Analysis

A model's reading — qwen3.8-27b, prompt own-v1, 2026-10-13T22:04Z · confidence high

The court held a Case Management Conference and ordered the parties to attend a video Settlement Conference on May 10, 2023. The court set deadlines for the submission of confidential settlement statements and required defense counsel to provide participant contact information for the video conference.

What the court decidedThe model
Set a video Settlement Conference for May 10, 2023, at 2:00 p.m.
“A video Settlement Conference (“SC”) is SET for May 10, 2023, at 2:00 p.m., before Magistrate [JUSTICE], Jr.”
agree with court
The order is a standard procedural scheduling directive issued by a Magistrate Judge following a Case Management Conference. It does not resolve any substantive legal issues or motions, and the scheduling of a settlement conference is within the court's inherent authority to manage its docket.
Ordered the parties to submit confidential settlement statements by May 3, 2023.
“On or before May 3, 2023, the parties shall submit directly to Magistrate [JUSTICE]’s chambers... confidential settlement statements.”
agree with court
Requiring settlement statements prior to a settlement conference is a standard and appropriate procedural requirement to facilitate meaningful negotiations.
Required defense counsel to provide participant contact information for the video conference by May 3, 2023.
“No later than May 3, 2023, defense counsel must send an e-mail to the Court... containing the following: (1) The name of each participant; (2) An e-mail address for each participant...; and (3) A telephone number...”
agree with court
This is a logistical requirement necessary to facilitate the video conference scheduled by the court.

The order itself: sound — The order is a procedural scheduling order that sets a settlement conference and associated deadlines. It does not apply substantive law to resolve a dispute or motion. The citations provided are used to define the requirements for attendance at the settlement conference, which is appropriate for this type of order. There are no legal arguments to evaluate for correctness in the traditional sense.

How this analysis was made · dispute it

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 MICHAEL ALLEN, Case No.: 20cv1389-JLS(LR)

11 Plaintiff, ORDER SETTING VIDEO 12 v. SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 13 THERESA CURRIER, 14 Defendant. 15 16 17 On April 7, 2023, the Court held a video Case Management Conference in this 18 case. (See ECF No. 87.) Pursuant to the discussions with the parties, the Court issues the 19 following ORDERS: 20 A video Settlement Conference (“SC”) is SET for May 10, 2023, at 2:00 p.m., 21 before Magistrate Judge Lupe Rodriguez, Jr. Counsel for Defendant shall arrange 22 Plaintiff’s video appearance with the institution housing Plaintiff. All discussions at 23 the SC will be informal, off the record, privileged, and confidential. The following rules 24 and deadlines apply: 25 a. Appearance via Videoconference Required: All named parties, 26 party representatives, claims adjusters for insured defendants, as well as the principal 27 attorney(s) responsible for the litigation, must be present and legally and factually 28 1 prepared to discuss and resolve the case at the SC. Counsel appearing without their 2 clients will be sanctioned, and the Court will terminate the conference. 3 b. Full Settlement Authority Required: A party or party 4 representative with full settlement authority1 must be present at the conference. A 5 government entity may be excused from this requirement so long as the government 6 attorney who attends the SC has (1) primary responsibility for handling the case, and 7 (2) authority to negotiate and recommend settlement offers to the government official(s) 8 having ultimate settlement authority. 9 c. Confidential Settlement Statements Required: On or before 10 May 3, 2023, the parties shall submit directly to Magistrate Judge Rodriguez’s chambers 11 (via hand delivery, mail, or by e-mail to the Court at efile_rodriguez@casd.uscourts.gov), 12 confidential settlement statements. The statements are limited to ten (10) pages, plus an 13 additional ten (10) pages of exhibits. A settlement statement must outline (1) the nature 14 of the case and the claims, (2) the party’s position on liability or defenses; (3) the party’s 15 position regarding settlement of the case with a specific demand/offer for settlement, 16 and (4) a summary of any previous settlement negotiations or mediation efforts. The 17 settlement statement must specifically identify what the discovery process revealed 18 and the effect that the evidence has on the issues in the case. To the extent specific 19 discovery responses, portions of deposition testimony, or expert reports are pertinent to 20 the Court’s evaluation of the matter, these documents must be attached as exhibits. 21 Evidence supporting or refuting either party’s claim for damages must also be identified 22 and included as an exhibit. 23 24 25 1 “Full settlement authority” means that a person is authorized to fully explore settlement options and to 26 agree at that time to any settlement terms acceptable to the parties. Heileman Brewing Co. v. Joseph Oat Corp., 871 F.2d 648, 653 (7th Cir. 1989). The person needs to have “unfettered discretion and 27 authority” to change the settlement position of a party. Pitman v. Brinker Int’l, Inc., 216 F.R.D. 481, 485–86 (D. Ariz. 2003). Limited or a sum certain authority is not adequate. See Nick v. Morgan’s 28 1 If a party cannot make a specific demand or offer, then the party must explain why 2 ||a demand or offer cannot be made and when the party will be able to state a demand or 3 offer. The settlement statement should be submitted confidentially and need not be 4 ||shared with other parties. 5 d. The Court will e-mail each SC participant an invitation to join a 6 ||Zoom video conference. No later than May 3, 2023, defense counsel must send an e- 7 || mail to the Court at efile_rodriguez@casd.uscourts.gov containing the following: 8 (1) The name of each participant; 9 (2) An e-mail address for each participant to receive the Zoom 10 || video conference invitation; and 11 (3) A telephone number where each participant may be reached so 12 || that if technical difficulties arise, the Court will be able to proceed telephonically instead 13 by video conference. 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 Dated: April 7, 2023 16 LY 17 Honorable Lupe Rodriguez, Jr. 13 United States Magistrate Judge 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28