gno.law

Williams v. United States Marshals

District Court, S.D. California · 3:22-cv-00139 · 2022-02-02 · Unknown

Proceeding
district
Area
civil
Panel
Cynthia Ann Bashant (author)

Analysis

A model's reading — qwen3.8-27b, prompt own-v1, 2026-10-13T22:39Z · confidence high

The court considered a pro se civil action filed by a detained plaintiff who had not paid the required filing fee or filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The court dismissed the action without prejudice and granted the plaintiff 45 days to pay the fee or file a proper IFP motion.

What the court decidedThe model
Dismissal of the civil action without prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis.
“DISMISSES this action sua sponte without prejudice for failure to pay the $402 civil filing and administrative fee or to submit a Motion to Proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a) and 1915(a)”
agree with court
The dismissal is procedurally correct under 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) and § 1915(a). A civil action cannot proceed without the payment of the filing fee or a grant of IFP status. Since the plaintiff failed to do either, the court was required to dismiss the case. The dismissal is without prejudice, allowing the plaintiff to cure the defect within the specified time frame.
Granting of a 45-day period for the plaintiff to pay the filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis.
“GRANTS Plaintiff forty-five (45) days from the date of this Order, or on or before March 21, 2022, to: (a) prepay the entire $402 civil filing and administrative fee in full; or (b) complete and file a Motion to Proceed IFP”
agree with court
Providing a specific deadline to cure the deficiency is a standard and appropriate procedural measure to allow pro se litigants to comply with filing requirements before the dismissal becomes final.

The order itself: sound — The order correctly identifies the statutory requirements for filing a civil action (28 U.S.C. § 1914(a)) and the alternative path for indigent litigants (28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)). It accurately cites Ninth Circuit precedent regarding the necessity of IFP status or fee payment. The procedural steps taken (dismissal without prejudice and a deadline to cure) are standard and legally sound for this situation.

How this analysis was made · dispute it

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Case No.: 3:22-cv-0139-BAS-BLM BILLY PAUL WILLIAMS, 12 ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL Plaintiff, 13 ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE v. FOR FAILING TO PAY 14 FILING FEE REQUIRED 15 BY 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) AND/OR UNITED STATES MARSHALS, FAILING TO MOVE TO PROCEED 16 Defendants. IN FORMA PAUPERIS 17 PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)

19 BILLY PAUL WILLIAMS (“Plaintiff”), currently detained, awaiting trial at the 20 Otay Mesa Detention Center in San Diego, California, and proceeding pro se, has filed a 21 civil action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of 22 Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). See Compl., ECF No. 1 at 2, 4. Plaintiff has not prepaid 23 the $402 civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a), however, and has not filed a 24 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). 25 26 I. Failure to Pay Filing Fee or Request IFP Status 27 All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the 1 United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of 2 $402. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a).1 An action may proceed despite a plaintiff’s failure to 3 prepay the entire fee only if he is granted leave to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 4 § 1915(a). See Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1051 (9th Cir. 2007); Rodriguez v. 5 Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). However, if the plaintiff is a prisoner, he 6 remains obligated to pay the entire filing fee in “increments” even if he is granted leave to 7 commence his suit IFP, see Williams v. Paramo, 775 F.3d 1182, 1185 (9th Cir. 2015), 8 regardless of whether his case is ultimately dismissed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) & (2); 9 Taylor v. Delatoore, 281 F.3d 844, 847 (9th Cir. 2002). 10 Here, Plaintiff has not prepaid the $402 in filing and administrative fees required to 11 commence this civil action, nor has he submitted a properly supported Motion to Proceed 12 IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Therefore, his case cannot yet proceed. See 28 U.S.C. 13 § 1914(a); Andrews, 493 F.3d at 1051. 14 15 II. Conclusion and Order 16 For the reasons set forth above, the Court hereby: 17 (1) DISMISSES this action sua sponte without prejudice for failure to pay the 18 $402 civil filing and administrative fee or to submit a Motion to Proceed IFP pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a) and 1915(a); and 20 (2) GRANTS Plaintiff forty-five (45) days from the date of this Order, or on or 21 before March 21, 2022, to: (a) prepay the entire $402 civil filing and administrative fee in 22 full; or (b) complete and file a Motion to Proceed IFP that includes a certified copy of his 23 trust account statement for the six-month period preceding the filing of his Complaint. See 24 25 1 In addition to the $350 statutory fee, civil litigants must pay an additional administrative fee of $52. See 26 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) (Judicial Conference Schedule of Fees, District Court Misc. Fee Schedule, § 14 (eff. Dec. 1, 2020). The additional $52 administrative fee does not apply to persons granted leave to proceed 27 IFP. Id. 1 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2); S.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 3.2(b). 2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall provide Plaintiff 3 || with this Court’s approved form, “Motion and Declaration in Support of Motion to Proceed 4 Forma Pauperis.” If Plaintiff fails to either prepay the $402 civil filing fee or complete 5 |}and submit the enclosed Motion to Proceed IFP within 45 days, this action will remain 6 || dismissed without prejudice based on Plaintiffs failure to satisfy 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a)’s fee 7 requirements and without further Order of the Court. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 A , 11 || DATED: February 2, 2022 Lin A (Lyohaa 6 12 United States District Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

Cites, in this corpus