Rodriguez v. Newsom
- Proceeding
- district
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Cathy Ann Bencivengo (author)
Analysis
The court reviewed a pro se civil rights complaint filed by a prisoner who had neither paid the required filing fee nor filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The court dismissed the action without prejudice and granted the plaintiff 45 days to pay the fee or file the motion.
| What the court decided | The model |
|---|---|
Dismissal of the civil action without prejudice“DISMISSES this action without prejudice based on Plaintiff’s failure to pay the filing fee or file a Motion to Proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a) and 1915(a).” | agree with court The dismissal is procedurally correct because 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) mandates a filing fee for civil actions, and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) provides the exclusive mechanism for waiver. The plaintiff failed to satisfy either requirement. The court correctly cited Andrews v. Cervantes for the proposition that the action may not proceed without fee payment or IFP status. |
Grant of 45 days to pay fee or file IFP motion“GRANTS Plaintiff forty-five (45) days leave from the date this Order is filed to: (a) prepay the entire civil filing fee in full; or (b) complete and file a Motion to Proceed IFP.” | agree with court The court has discretion to set a deadline for curing a procedural defect before final dismissal. The 45-day period is consistent with local rules (S.D. Cal. CivLR 3.2(b)) and provides a reasonable opportunity for the plaintiff to comply with statutory requirements. |
The order itself: sound — The order correctly identifies the statutory requirements for commencing a civil action (fee payment or IFP status) and applies them to the plaintiff's failure to comply. The citations to Ninth Circuit precedent are accurate and support the procedural dismissal. The order provides a clear path for the plaintiff to cure the defect, which is consistent with judicial practice in pro se prisoner litigation.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 PEDRO RODRIGUEZ, Case No.: 21cv1762-CAB (JLB) BOOKING #14745493, 13 ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL Plaintiffs, 14 ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE vs. FOR FAILING TO PAY 15 FILING FEE REQUIRED GOVERNOR GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., 16 BY 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) AND/OR Defendants. FAILING TO MOVE TO PROCEED 17 IN FORMA PAUPERIS 18 PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) 19 20 Plaintiff Pedro Rodriguez, a person detained at the San Diego County Central Jail 21 and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil right complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF 22 No. 1.) Plaintiff has not prepaid the $400 civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) 23 and has not filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 24 § 1915(a). 25 I. Failure to Pay Filing Fee or Request IFP Status 26 All parties instituting any civil action in a district court of the United States, except 27 a petition for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $402, and the action may 28 proceed despite a failure to prepay the entire fee only if leave to proceed IFP is granted 1 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 2 F.3d 1047, 1051 (9th Cir. 2007). Section 1915(a)(2) requires prisoners seeking leave to 3 proceed IFP to submit a “certified copy of the trust fund account statement (or institutional 4 equivalent) for . . . the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint.” 5 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2); Andrews v. King, 398 F.3d 1113, 1119 (9th Cir. 2005); 28 U.S.C. 6 § 1915(h) (defining a “prisoner” as “any person” who at the time of filing is “incarcerated 7 or detained in any facility who is accused of, convicted of, sentenced for, or adjudicated 8 delinquent for, violations of criminal law or the terms or conditions of parole, probation, 9 pretrial release, or diversionary program.”) From the certified trust account statement, the 10 Court assesses an initial payment of 20% of (a) the average monthly deposits in the account 11 for the past six months, or (b) the average monthly balance in the account for the past six 12 months, whichever is greater, unless the prisoner has no assets. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) 13 & (4). The institution collects subsequent payments, assessed at 20% of the preceding 14 month’s income, in any month in which the account exceeds $10, and forwards those 15 payments to the Court until the entire filing fee is paid. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). 16 Plaintiff remains obligated to pay the entire fee in monthly installments regardless of 17 whether their action is ultimately dismissed. Bruce v. Samuels, 577 U.S. 82, 84 (2016); 28 18 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) & (2); Taylor v. Delatoore, 281 F.3d 844, 847 (9th Cir. 2002). 19 Because Plaintiff has neither paid the filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) to 20 commence a civil action, nor filed a Motion to Proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 21 § 1915(a), his case cannot proceed at this time. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); Andrews, 493 22 F.3d at 1051. 23 / / / 24 / / / 25 26 27 1 In addition to a $350 fee, civil litigants, other than those granted leave to proceed IFP, must pay an additional administrative fee of $52. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) (Judicial 28 1 Conclusion and Order 2 Accordingly, the Court: 3 (1) DISMISSES this action without prejudice based on Plaintiff’s failure to pay 4 || the filing fee or file a Motion to Proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. $§ 1914(a) and 1915(a). 5 (2) GRANTS Plaintiff forty-five (45) days leave from the date this Order is filed 6 || to: (a) prepay the entire civil filing fee in full; or (b) complete and file a Motion to Proceed 7 ||IFP. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2); S.D. Cal. CivLR 3.2(b). 8 (3) DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to provide Plaintiff with the Court’s 9 ||approved form “Motion and Declaration in Support of Motion to Proceed In Forma 10 || Pauperis.’” If Plaintiff fails to either prepay the civil filing fee or fully complete and submit 11 enclosed Motion to Proceed IFP within 45 days, this action will remain dismissed 12 || without prejudice based on his failure to satisfy 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a)’s fee requirement and 13 || without further Order of the Court. 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 ||Dated: October 14, 2021 € Z 16 Hon. Cathy Ann Bencivengo 17 United States District Judge 18 19 20 21 22 || 24 |I2 Plaintiff is cautioned that if he chooses to proceed further by submitting a properly 25 || Supported Motion to Proceed IFP, his Complaint will be screened before service and may 5 be dismissed sua sponte pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 122, 1126-27 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc) (noting that 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) “not only permits 27 ||but requires” the court to sua sponte dismiss an in forma pauperis complaint that is 28 frivolous, malicious, fails to state a claim, or seeks damages from defendants who are immune).