Securities and Exchange Commission v. Cash Capital, LLC
- Proceeding
- district
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Cynthia Ann Bashant (author)
Analysis
The court considered the SEC's motion to hold Defendant Robert Wilson in civil contempt for failing to submit a sworn accounting of his finances as ordered. The court found Wilson in civil contempt, ordered him to submit the accounting and other discovery responses by specific dates, and continued the show cause hearing to December 9, 2020.
| What the court decided | The model |
|---|---|
Defendant Robert Wilson is found in civil contempt for failing to comply with the Court's September 11, 2020 order to submit a sworn accounting.“Accordingly, and as stated on the record during the hearing, the Court FINDS Mr. Wilson in CIVIL CONTEMPT of the Court’s September 11, 2020 order because of his failure to provide an accounting as ordered.” | agree with court The court applied the correct legal standard for civil contempt, requiring a showing that the defendant disobeyed a specific and definite order and failed to demonstrate that he took all reasonable steps to comply. The record indicates Wilson did not file the accounting by the deadline and did not provide an excuse at the hearing. The finding is supported by the cited Ninth Circuit authority. |
Defendant Robert Wilson is ordered to provide a sworn accounting of his finances, bank account information, and responses to discovery requests by specified dates.“Mr. Wilson is ORDERED to comply with the Court’s order and provide a sworn accounting of the following information by December 7, 2020... Mr. Wilson is FURTHER ORDERED to provide to the SEC the following: (1) His current bank account information by November 4, 2020. (2) Responses to the post-judgment document requests and interrogatories... by December 7, 2020.” | agree with court The court imposed specific, definite orders to cure the contempt and facilitate the enforcement of the underlying consent judgment. The deadlines are reasonable and the scope of the accounting is tailored to the court's previous order and the SEC's enforcement needs. |
The show cause hearing is continued to December 9, 2020, to determine whether Wilson should be held in contempt for failing to comply with the Final Judgment.“Lastly, the Court CONTINUES the show cause hearing to December 9, 2020 at 1 p.m. ... At that hearing, the Court will determine whether Mr. Wilson should be held in contempt for his failure to comply with the Final Judgment (ECF No. 51), as requested by the SEC.” | agree with court Continuing the hearing allows the court to assess compliance with the new orders before determining if further sanctions are warranted for the underlying judgment violation. This is a standard procedural step in contempt proceedings. |
The order itself: sound — The order correctly applies the Ninth Circuit's standard for civil contempt, citing relevant case law to support the finding that Wilson disobeyed a specific order without a valid excuse. The court's imposition of coercive sanctions (conditional fines) and specific compliance orders is consistent with the cited authorities. The reasoning is clear and directly addresses the motion.
Opinion
7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Case No. 17-cv-01536-BAS-AGS 11 COMMISSION, ORDER FINDING DEFENDANT 12 Plaintiff, ROBERT WILSON IN CIVIL v. CONTEMPT AND CONTINUING 13 SHOW CAUSE HEARING CASH CAPITAL, LLC; AMERICA’S 14 STRATEGIC ORE PROPERTIES, LLC; and ROBERT WILSON, 15 Defendants. 16 17 On May 26, 2020, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filed a Motion 18 for an Order to Show Cause Why Defendant Robert Wilson Should Not Be Held in Civil 19 Contempt (“Motion”), alleging that Mr. Wilson had not made any payments to satisfy his 20 obligations under a final consent judgment entered on April 25, 2019 resolving securities 21 fraud claims. (ECF No. 54.) On September 11, 2020, the Court granted the Motion 22 (“Order”). (ECF No. 69.) Among other things, the Court set a show cause hearing for 23 October 28, 2020 and required Defendant Wilson to submit a sworn accounting of his 24 finances by September 30, 2020. (Id. at 3–4.) 25 Mr. Wilson did not submit a sworn accounting by the deadline. On October 9, 2020, 26 nine days after Mr. Wilson’s deadline to comply with the Court’s order, the SEC filed a 27 Notice of Noncompliance noting that Mr. Wilson neither filed a sworn accounting with 28 the Court nor sent a copy to the Commission. (ECF No. 70.) 1 The SEC appeared telephonically and Mr. Wilson appeared in-person for the 2 hearing on October 28, 2020. (ECF No. 73.) As of the date of the hearing, Mr. Wilson 3 failed to submit a sworn accounting or otherwise provide any of the information required 4 by the Court. 5 Mr. Wilson disobeyed a specific and definite order of this Court and did not 6 demonstrate at the hearing or otherwise that he took all reasonable steps to comply but 7 was unable to do so. See In re Dual-Deck Video Cassette Recorder Antitrust Litig., 10 8 F.3d 693, 695 (9th Cir. 1993); Stone v. City & Cty. of S.F., 968 F.2d 850, 856 n.9 (9th Cir. 9 1992). Accordingly, and as stated on the record during the hearing, the Court FINDS Mr. 10 Wilson in CIVIL CONTEMPT of the Court’s September 11, 2020 order because of his 11 failure to provide an accounting as ordered. 12 Mr. Wilson is ORDERED to comply with the Court’s order and provide a sworn 13 accounting of the following information by December 7, 2020: 14 (1) Each account, including safe deposit boxes, with any bank, financial institution or brokerage firm, maintained in the names of Robert Wilson 15 or any entity he controls, or the names of any subsidiary, affiliate, or agent, in which they have direct or indirect control or beneficial interest, 16 and the current value and makeup of that account; 17 (2) All investments, securities, funds, real estate, and other assets held in the 18 names of Robert Wilson or any entity that he controls, or in the names of any subsidiary, affiliate, or agent or under their direct or indirect control, 19 stating a description, a value, and location of such assets; and 20 (3) Every transaction in which the ownership, direction, or control of any funds or other assets of any kind of have been transferred, directly or 21 indirectly, to or from Robert Wilson or any entity he controls since April 22 25, 2019. 23 Mr. Wilson is warned that if he fails to timely comply, he will be fined $10,000 for 24 each day of noncompliance. See Shell Offshore Inc. v. Greenpeace, Inc., 815 F.3d 623, 25 629 (9th Cir. 2016) (“[C]oercive civil sanctions, intended to deter, generally take the form 26 of conditional fines.”); In re Dyer, 322 F.3d 1178, 1192 (9th Cir. 2003) (“Civil penalties 27 must either be compensatory or designed to coerce compliance.”). 28 Mr. Wilson is FURTHER ORDERED to provide to the SEC the following: 1 (1) His current bank account information by November 4, 2020. 2 (2) Responses to the post-judgment document requests and interrogatories— 3 which were previously propounded in this action—by December 7, 2020. 4 Lastly, the Court CONTINUES the show cause hearing to December 9, 2020 at 5 p.m. Mr. Wilson is once again required to appear in person for this hearing, and 6 ||counsel for the SEC may appear by phone using the same teleconference information 7 ||provided by the Court for the October 28, 2020 hearing. (See ECF No. 72.) At that 8 || hearing, the Court will determine whether Mr. Wilson should be held in contempt for his 9 failure to comply with the Final Judgment (ECF No. 51), as requested by the SEC. The 10 || SEC shall update the Court about the status of this case the day before the hearing. 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 , fl 13 || DATED: October 28, 2020 Cyl □ Hishasa □ 14 United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28