Casey v. General Motors, LLC

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 REBECCA CASEY, individually, Case No.: 20-cv-299-WQH-MSB and on behalf of a class of 12 similarly situated individuals, ORDER 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, 16 Defendant. 17 HAYES, Judge: 18 On February 18, 2020, Plaintiff Rebecca Casey filed a Complaint against Defendant 19 General Motors, LLC. (ECF No. 1). On July 31, 2020, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss 20 the Complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 21 11). On August 6, 2020, the Court issued an Order that stated, “The deadline for Plaintiff 22 to file her opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or file an amended Complaint, if 23 any, is extended to September 15, 2020.” (ECF No. 13 at 1). On September 15, 2020, 24 Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 14). 25 Once filed, an amended complaint supersedes the original complaint in its entirety. 26 Ramirez v. Cty. of San Bernardino, 806 F.3d 1002, 1008 (9th Cir. 2015). Defendant’s 27 28 1 || Motion to Dismiss, addressing the original Complaint, became moot once Plaintiff filed 2 Amended Complaint. Jd. 3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Complaint 4 || (ECF No. 11) 1s denied as moot. 5 6 || Dated: September 17, 2020 BME: ie Z. A a 7 Hon. William Q. Hayes g United States District Court 9 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28