gno.law

Bonilla v. Battaglia

District Court, S.D. California · 3:20-cv-00769 · 2020-04-27 · Unknown

Proceeding
district
Area
civil
Panel
Larry Alan Burns (author)

Analysis

A model's reading — qwen3.8-27b, prompt own-v1, 2026-10-13T23:46Z · confidence high

The court reviewed a civil rights action filed by a pro se prisoner who failed to pay the required filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The court dismissed the action without prejudice and granted the plaintiff 30 days to pay the fee or file a proper IFP motion.

What the court decidedThe model
Dismissal of the civil action without prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee or move to proceed in forma pauperis.
“DISMISSES this action sua sponte without prejudice for failure to pay the $400 civil filing and administrative fee or to submit a Motion to Proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a) and 1915(a)”
agree with court
The dismissal is procedurally correct under 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) and § 1915(a). A civil action cannot proceed unless the filing fee is paid or the plaintiff is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The order recites that the plaintiff did neither. Dismissing without prejudice allows the plaintiff to cure the defect, which is the standard remedy in this context.
Granting the plaintiff 30 days to pay the filing fee or file a Motion to Proceed IFP.
“GRANTS Plaintiff thirty (30) days leave from the date this Order is filed to: (a) prepay the entire $400 civil filing and administrative fee in full; or (b) complete and file a Motion to Proceed IFP”
agree with court
Granting a short period to cure a procedural defect like a missing filing fee or IFP motion is within the court's discretion and consistent with the goal of allowing pro se litigants to comply with procedural requirements. The order also directs the Clerk to provide the necessary forms, which is a helpful and appropriate administrative step.

The order itself: sound — The order correctly identifies the legal requirements for commencing a civil action (payment of fee or IFP status) and applies them to the facts recited (plaintiff did neither). It cites the correct statutes and Ninth Circuit precedent. The remedy (dismissal without prejudice with a short window to cure) is standard and appropriate. The reasoning is direct and answers the procedural deficiency.

How this analysis was made · dispute it

inconsistent with cited authority

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Case No.: 3:20-cv-00769-LAB-MDD STEVEN WAYNE BONILLA, 12 ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL Plaintiff, 13 ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE v. FOR FAILING TO PAY 14 FILING FEE REQUIRED JUDGE ANTHONY BATTAGLIA, 15 BY 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) AND/OR Defendant. FAILING TO MOVE TO PROCEED 16 IN FORMA PAUPERIS 17 PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) 18 19 20 STEVEN WAYNE BONILLA (“Plaintiff”), currently incarcerated at San Quentin 21 State Prison located in San Quentin, California, and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil 22 rights action (ECF No. 1). 23 I. Failure to Pay Filing Fee or Request IFP Status 24 All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the 25 United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of 26 / / / 27 / / / 1 $400. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a).1 An action may proceed despite a plaintiff’s failure to 2 prepay the entire fee only if he is granted leave to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 3 § 1915(a). See Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1051 (9th Cir. 2007); Rodriguez v. 4 Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). However, if the Plaintiff is a prisoner, and 5 even if he is granted leave to commence his suit IFP, he remains obligated to pay the 6 entire filing fee in “increments,” see Williams v. Paramo, 775 F.3d 1182, 1185 (9th Cir. 7 2015), regardless of whether his case is ultimately dismissed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) 8 & (2); Taylor v. Delatoore, 281 F.3d 844, 847 (9th Cir. 2002). 9 Plaintiff has not prepaid the $400 in filing and administrative fees required to 10 commence this civil action, nor has he submitted a properly supported Motion to Proceed 11 IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Therefore, his case cannot yet proceed. See 28 12 U.S.C. § 1914(a); Andrews, 493 F.3d at 1051. 13 II. Conclusion and Order 14 For the reasons set forth above, the Court hereby: 15 (1) DISMISSES this action sua sponte without prejudice for failure to pay the 16 $400 civil filing and administrative fee or to submit a Motion to Proceed IFP pursuant to 17 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a) and 1915(a); and 18 (2) GRANTS Plaintiff thirty (30) days leave from the date this Order is filed 19 to: (a) prepay the entire $400 civil filing and administrative fee in full; or (b) complete 20 and file a Motion to Proceed IFP which includes a certified copy of his trust account 21 statement for the 6-month period preceding the filing of his Complaint. See 28 U.S.C. 22 § 1915(a)(2); S.D. Cal. CivLR 3.2(b). 23 / / / 24 25 1 In addition to the $350 statutory fee, civil litigants must pay an additional administrative fee of $50. 26 See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) (Judicial Conference Schedule of Fees, District Court Misc. Fee Schedule, § 14 (eff. Dec. 1, 2014). The additional $50 administrative fee does not apply to persons granted leave to 27 proceed IFP. Id. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall provide Plaintiff 2 || with this Court’s approved form “Motion and Declaration in Support of Motion to 3 || Proceed In Forma Pauperis.” If Plaintiff fails to either prepay the $400 civil filing fee or 4 ||complete and submit the enclosed Motion to Proceed IFP within 45 days, this action will 5 ||remain dismissed without prejudice based on Plaintiff's failure to satisfy 28 U.S.C. 6 || $ 1914(a)’s fee requirements and without further Order of the Court. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 || Dated: April 24, 2020 ( dug A f ZunlV 9 arry Alan Burns 10 United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

Cites, in this corpus