gno.law

Bradford v. Paramo

District Court, S.D. California · 3:20-cv-00278 · 2020-04-09 · Unknown

Proceeding
district
Area
civil
Panel
Janis L. Sammartino (author)

Analysis

A model's reading — qwen3.8-27b, prompt own-v1, 2026-10-13T23:48Z · confidence high

The court reviewed a pro se civil rights complaint filed by a state inmate who failed to pay the required filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The court dismissed the action without prejudice and granted the plaintiff 45 days to either pay the fee or file a compliant IFP motion.

What the court decidedThe model
Dismissal of civil action without prejudice for failure to pay filing fees or file IFP motion
“DISMISSES this civil action without prejudice based on Plaintiffs failure to pay the $400 civil filing and administrative fee or to submit a Motion to Proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. $§ 1914(a) and 1915(a).”
agree with court
The dismissal is procedurally correct because 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) mandates a filing fee for civil actions, and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) provides the exclusive mechanism for waiver. The plaintiff failed to satisfy either requirement. Dismissing without prejudice is the standard remedy to allow the plaintiff to cure the defect.
Grant of 45 days leave to cure fee deficiency
“GRANTS Plaintiff forty-five (45) days leave from the date this Order is filed to: (a) prepay the entire $400 civil filing and administrative fee in full; or (b) complete and file a motion to proceed IFP which complies with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) and S.D. Cal. CivLR 3.2(b).”
agree with court
Granting a specific period to cure a procedural defect before final dismissal is a common and equitable practice in district courts, particularly for pro se litigants, to ensure due process is satisfied before the case is permanently closed.

The order itself: sound — The order correctly identifies the statutory requirements for filing fees and IFP status. It accurately cites Ninth Circuit precedent regarding the obligations of prisoner-litigants and the procedural steps required to obtain IFP status. The dismissal without prejudice, coupled with a specific deadline to cure, is a legally sound and procedurally appropriate response to the failure to pay fees.

How this analysis was made · dispute it

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD, C a s e N o . : 3 : 2 0 - c v - 0 2 7 8 - J L S - M D D CDCR #H-16258, 12 ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL Plaintiff, 13 ACTION FOR FAILING TO vs. PREPAY FILING FEES REQUIRED 14 BY 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) OR FILE A DANIEL PARAMO, 15 MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA Defendant. PAUPERIS 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff Raymond Alford Bradford, a state inmate currently housed at California 20 State Prison, Sacramento located in Represa, California and proceeding pro se, has filed 21 this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See ECF No. 1 (“Compl.”). 22 Plaintiff did not prepay the civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) at the 23 time he submitted his Complaint, nor has he filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 24 (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). 25 I. Failure to Pay Filing Fee or Request IFP Status 26 All parties instituting any civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the 27 United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of 28 /// 1 $400. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed despite a plaintiff’s failure to 2 prepay the entire fee only if he is granted leave to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 3 § 1915(a). See Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). Section 4 1915(a)(2) requires all persons seeking to proceed without full prepayment of fees to file 5 an affidavit that includes a statement of all assets possessed and demonstrates an inability 6 to pay. See Escobedo v. Applebees, 787 F.3d 1226, 1234 (9th Cir. 2015). 7 Plaintiff is further cautioned that even if he files an IFP Motion and affidavit in 8 compliance with § 1915(a)(2), he will nevertheless remain obligated to pay the entire fee 9 in “increments,” see Williams v. Paramo, 775 F.3d 1182, 1185 (9th Cir. 2015), regardless 10 of whether his case is ultimately dismissed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1)–(2); Taylor v. 11 Delatoore, 281 F.3d 844, 847 (9th Cir. 2002). A “prisoner” is defined as “any person” 12 who at the time of filing is “incarcerated or detained in any facility who is accused of, 13 convicted of, sentenced for, or adjudicated delinquent for, violations of criminal law or the 14 terms or conditions of parole, probation, pretrial release, or diversionary program.” 28 15 U.S.C. § 1915(h); Taylor, 281 F.3d at 847. 16 Plaintiff must also submit a “certified copy of [his] trust fund account statement (or 17 institutional equivalent) . . . for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the 18 complaint.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). From the certified trust account statement, the Court 19 will assess an initial payment of 20% of (a) the average monthly deposits in Plaintiff’s 20 account for the past six months, or (b) the average monthly balance in the account for the 21 past six months, whichever is greater, unless he has no assets. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1), 22 (4); Taylor, 281 F.3d at 850. After, the Court will direct the institution having custody to 23 collect subsequent payments, assessed at 20% of the preceding month’s income, in any 24 /// 25 26 1 In addition to the $350 statutory fee, civil litigants must pay an additional administrative fee of $50. See 27 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) (Judicial Conference Schedule of Fees, District Court Misc. Fee Schedule, § 14 (eff. June. 1, 2016)). The additional $50 administrative fee does not apply to persons granted leave to proceed 28 1 ||month in which his account exceeds $10, and forward them to the Court until the entire 2 || filing fee is paid. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). 3 Because Plaintiff has neither paid the filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) to 4 ||commence a civil action, nor filed a properly supported motion to proceed IFP pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 1915(a), his case cannot yet proceed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); Andrews, 493 6 || F.3d at 1051. 7 Conclusion and Order 8 Accordingly, the Court: 9 (1) DISMISSES this civil action without prejudice based on Plaintiffs failure to 10 || pay the $400 civil filing and administrative fee or to submit a Motion to Proceed IFP 11 || pursuant to 28 U.S.C. $§ 1914(a) and 1915(a). 12 (2) GRANTS Plaintiff forty-five (45) days leave from the date this Order is filed 13 || to: (a) prepay the entire $400 civil filing and administrative fee in full; or (b) complete and 14 || file a motion to proceed IFP which complies with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) and S.D. Cal. 15 || CivLR 3.2(b). 16 (3) DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to provide Plaintiff with the Court’s 17 |}approved form “Motion and Declaration in Support of Motion to Proceed In Forma 18 || Pauperis.” If Plaintiff fails to either prepay the $400 civil filing fee or fully complete and 19 |}submit the enclosed Motion to Proceed IFP within 45 days, this action will remain 20 ||dismissed without prejudice based on his failure to satisfy 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a)’s fee 21 |}requirement and without further Order of the Court. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 ||Dated: April 10, 2020 tt f Le 24 on. Janis L. Sammartino 25 United States District Judge 26 27 28 3

Cites, in this corpus