Thomas v. Roth
- Proceeding
- district
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- John A. Houston (author)
Analysis
The court reviewed a pro se civil rights complaint filed by a state inmate who failed to pay the required filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The court dismissed the action without prejudice and granted the plaintiff 45 days to pay the fee or file a compliant IFP motion.
| What the court decided | The model |
|---|---|
Dismissal of civil action without prejudice“DISMISSES this civil action without prejudice based on Plaintiff’s failure to pay the $400 civil filing and administrative fee or to submit a Motion to Proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a) and 1915 (a).” | agree with court The dismissal is procedurally correct because 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) mandates the payment of filing fees to commence a civil action, and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) provides the exclusive exception for indigent litigants. Since the plaintiff did not satisfy either requirement, the court lacked jurisdiction to proceed on the merits. Dismissing without prejudice is the standard remedy to allow the plaintiff to cure the defect. |
Grant of 45 days leave to cure defect“GRANTS Plaintiff forty-five (45) days leave from the date this Order is filed to: (a) prepay the entire $400 civil filing and administrative fee in full; or (b) complete and file a Motion to Proceed IFP which complies with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) and S.D. Cal. CivLR 3.2(b).” | agree with court Granting a reasonable period to cure a procedural defect in a pro se prisoner case is consistent with the liberal construction afforded to pro se pleadings and the purpose of the IFP statute to ensure access to the courts for indigent litigants. |
The order itself: sound — The order correctly identifies the statutory requirements for commencing a civil action and the exclusive exception for indigent litigants. It accurately cites Ninth Circuit precedent regarding the necessity of IFP status and the ongoing obligation to pay fees. The remedy of dismissal without prejudice with a deadline to cure is appropriate and standard for this procedural defect.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MELINDA K. THOMAS, Case No.: 3:20-cv-0200-JAH-KSC CDCR #WG-1550, 12 ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL Plaintiff, 13 ACTION FOR FAILING TO vs. PREPAY FILING FEES REQUIRED 14 BY 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) OR FILE A JENNIFER ROTH; PARAQ SHAH, 15 MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA Defendants. PAUPERIS 16 17 18 19 Melinda K. Thomas (“Plaintiff”), a state inmate currently housed at the California 20 Institution for Women located in Corona, California and proceeding pro se, has filed this 21 civil rights action (“Compl.”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See ECF No. 1. 22 Plaintiff did not prepay the civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) at the 23 time she submitted her Complaint, nor has she filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma 24 Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). 25 I. Failure to Pay Filing Fee or Request IFP Status 26 All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the 27 United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of 28 1 $400. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed despite a plaintiff’s failure to 2 prepay the entire fee only if she is granted leave to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 3 § 1915(a). See Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). Section 1915(a)(2) 4 requires all persons seeking to proceed without full prepayment of fees to file an affidavit 5 that includes a statement of all assets possessed and demonstrates an inability to pay. See 6 Escobedo v. Applebees, 787 F.3d 1226, 1234 (9th Cir. 2015). 7 Plaintiff is further cautioned that even if she files an IFP Motion and affidavit in 8 compliance with § 1915(a)(2), she will nevertheless remain obligated to pay the entire fee 9 in “increments,” see Williams v. Paramo, 775 F.3d 1182, 1185 (9th Cir. 2015), regardless 10 of whether her case is ultimately dismissed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) & (2); Taylor v. 11 Delatoore, 281 F.3d 844, 847 (9th Cir. 2002). A “prisoner” is defined as “any person” who 12 at the time of filing is “incarcerated or detained in any facility who is accused of, convicted 13 of, sentenced for, or adjudicated delinquent for, violations of criminal law or the terms or 14 conditions of parole, probation, pretrial release, or diversionary program.” 28 U.S.C. 15 § 1915(h); Taylor, 281 F.3d at 847. 16 Plaintiff must also submit a “certified copy of [his] trust fund account statement (or 17 institutional equivalent) . . . for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the 18 complaint.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). From the certified trust account statement, the Court 19 will assess an initial payment of 20% of (a) the average monthly deposits in Plaintiff’s 20 account for the past six months, or (b) the average monthly balance in the account for the 21 past six months, whichever is greater, unless she has no assets. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1), 22 (4); Taylor, 281 F.3d at 850. After, the Court will direct the institution having custody to 23 collect subsequent payments, assessed at 20% of the preceding month’s income, in any 24 25 26 1 In addition to the $350 statutory fee, civil litigants must pay an additional administrative 27 fee of $50. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) (Judicial Conference Schedule of Fees, District Court Misc. Fee Schedule, § 14 (eff. June. 1, 2016). The additional $50 administrative fee does 28 1 ||month in which her account exceeds $10, and forward them to the Court until the entire 2 || filing fee is paid. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). 3 Because Plaintiff has neither paid the filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) to 4 ||commence a civil action, nor filed a properly supported Motion to Proceed /FP pursuant 5 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), her case cannot yet proceed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); Andrews, 6 ||493 F.3d at 1051. 7 Conclusion and Order 8 Accordingly, the Court: 9 (1) DISMISSES this civil action without prejudice based on Plaintiff’s failure to 10 || pay the $400 civil filing and administrative fee or to submit a Motion to Proceed [FP 11 |} pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a) and 1915 (a). 12 (2) GRANTS Plaintiff forty-five (45) days leave from the date this Order is filed 13 || to: (a) prepay the entire $400 civil filing and administrative fee in full; or (b) complete and 14 || file a Motion to Proceed JFP which complies with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) and S.D. Cal. 15 ||} CivLR 3.2(b). 16 (3) DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to provide Plaintiff with the Court’s 17 ||approved form “Motion and Declaration in Support of Motion to Proceed In Forma 18 || Pauperis.” If Plaintiff fails to either prepay the $400 civil filing fee or fully complete and 19 ||submit the enclosed Motion to Proceed JFP within 45 days, this action will remain 20 ||dismissed without prejudice based on her failure to satisfy 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a)’s fee 21 |}requirement and without further Order of the Court. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 || Dated: February 10, 2020 25 26 n. John A. Houston 17 Yynited States District Judge 28 3
Cites, in this corpus
- Lonnie Williams, Jr. v. Daniel Paramo 13-56004 · 2015-01-07