People v. DeLeon CA2/2
- Area
- criminal
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
Filed 2/7/24 P. v. DeLeon CA2/2 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
THE PEOPLE, B328822
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. PA098765) v.
JONATHAN DELEON,
Defendants and Appellants.
THE COURT: Defendant and appellant Jonathan DeLeon (defendant) appeals following his convictions of robbery and grand theft after a plea of no contest. After reviewing the record and finding no arguable issues, appointed counsel filed an opening brief asking this court to review the record independently pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. On October 19, 2023, we notified defendant of his counsel’s brief and gave him leave to file, within 30 days, his own brief or letter stating any grounds or argument he might wish to have considered. That time has elapsed, and defendant has submitted no brief or letter. We have reviewed the record, and finding no arguable issues, we affirm the judgment.
DISPOSITION The judgment is affirmed.
____________________________________________________________ ASHMANN-GERST, Acting P. J. CHAVEZ, J. HOFFSTADT, J.
Cites, in this corpus
- People v. Wende Crim. 20851 · 1979-10-12