USA V. CYNTHIA MONTOYA
- Area
- other
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 14 2022 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-50129 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:20-cr-02914-LAB-1 v. Southern District of California, San Diego CYNTHIA LEON MONTOYA, ORDER Defendant-Appellant.
MURGUIA, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)
and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.
Judges Owens and Bumatay did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.