P. v. Vargas CA3
- Area
- criminal
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
Filed 3/7/13 P. v. Vargas CA3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED COPY California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ----
THE PEOPLE, C067801
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 09F05780)
v. ORDER MODIFYING OPINION DOMINGO GARCIA VARGAS, [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT] Defendant and Appellant.
THE COURT: It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on February 19, 2013, be modified as follows: On page 11, the first paragraph of section II, in the first sentence “K.B.” is changed to “S.G.” so the sentence reads:
1 Defendant was convicted of both forcible sexual penetration (§ 289(a)(1)) and assault with intent to commit forcible sexual penetration (§§ 220/289(a)(1)) of S.G.
There is no change in the judgment.
HULL , J.
We concur:
RAYE , P. J.
ROBIE , J.