People v. Castaneda
- Area
- criminal
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
Filed 8/17/11
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, ) ) S085348 Plaintiff and Respondent, ) ) San Bernardino County v. ) Super. Ct. No. FWV-15543 ) GABRIEL CASTANEDA, ) ) ORDER MODIFYING Defendant and Appellant. ) OPINION ___________________________________ )
THE COURT: The opinion herein, filed on June 30, 2011, appearing at 51 Cal.4th 1292, is modified as follows: The fourth sentence of the first paragraph on page 1303, commencing with the words “Their third appointment” and ending with the words “alone in the office,” is modified to read as follows: Their third appointment was on Monday, March 9, at 9:30 a.m., when the victim apparently was alone in the office. This modification does not affect the judgment.
Cites, in this corpus
- People v. Castaneda S085348 · 2011-06-30