People v. Houston
- Area
- criminal
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
Filed 9/19/12
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, ) ) Plaintiff and Respondent, ) ) S035190 v. ) ) ERIC CHRISTOPHER HOUSTON, ) ) Napa County Defendant and Appellant. ) Super. Ct. No. CR 14311 ____________________________________)
ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING
THE COURT: The opinion in this matter filed August 2, 2012, and appearing at 54 Cal.4th 1186, is modified as follows:
On page 1192, the sentence reading, “In early 1992, defendant on several occasions told his best friend, David Rewerts, that he would like to go to Lindhurst High School and shoot a couple of people,” is modified to read, “On several occasions in early 1992, defendant and his best friend, David Rewerts, discussed going to Lindhurst High School and shooting on the school grounds; in at least one such discussion, defendant said he would like to shoot a couple of people at the school.”
This modification does not change the judgment.
The petition for rehearing is denied.
Cites, in this corpus
- People v. Houston S035190 · 2012-08-02