gno.law

Rockefeller Tech. Invs. (ASIA) v. Changzhou Sinotype Tech. Co.

California Supreme Court · S249923 · 2018-09-26 · Published · 238 Cal. Rptr. 3d 118 · 426 P.3d 303

ROCKEFELLER TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENTS (ASIA) VII v. CHANGZHOU SINOTYPE TECHNOLOGY CO.

Area
civil
Panel
Cantil (author), Carol A. Corrigan, Goodwin H. Liu, Chin, Sakauye, Mariano-Florentino Cuéllar, Leondra R. Kruger

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

The petition for review is granted. The parties are to brief and argue the following issue: Can private parties contractually agree to legal service of process by methods not expressly authorized by the Hague Convention?