People v. Meraz
PEOPLE v. MERAZ
- Area
- criminal
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
Bibiano's and Meraz's petitions for review are granted. Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration and disposition of related issues in People v. Arzate, S238032, and People v. Padilla, S239454 (see Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.512(d)(2) ), or pending further order of the court. Submission of additional briefing, pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.520, is deferred pending further order of the court. Chambasis's petition for review is denied. It is ordered that the opinion in the above-titled appeal, published at 6 Cal.App.5th 1162, 212 Cal.Rptr.3d 81, remain precedential. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(e)(3).)
Cites, in this corpus
- People v. Meraz No. B245657 · 2016-12-21