gno.law

In re Bonilla

California Supreme Court · S214960 · 2016-08-17 · Published · 208 Cal. Rptr. 3d 275 · 381 P.3d 222

IN RE BONILLA (Joseph) on H.C.

Area
other
Panel
Cantil (author), Carol A. Corrigan, Goodwin H. Liu, Kathryn Werdegar, Chin, Sakauye, Mariano-Florentino Cuéllar, Leondra R. Kruger

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

The matter is transferred to the Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division **223Two. That court is ordered to vacate its denial dated October 29, 2013 and is further ordered to issue an order to show cause, returnable before the Los Angeles County Superior Court. The Secretary of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is to be ordered to show cause, when the matter is placed on calendar, why petitioner is not entitled to make a record of "mitigating evidence tied to his youth." (See People v. Franklin (2016) 63 Cal.4th 261, 268-269, 283-284, 202 Cal.Rptr.3d 496, 370 P.3d 1053.) The return is *276to be filed on or before September 16, 2016.

Cites, in this corpus