People v. Hicks
PEOPLE v. HICKS.
- Area
- criminal
- Panel
- Cantil (author), Carol A. Corrigan, Goodwin H. Liu, Kathryn Werdegar, Chin, Sakauye, Mariano-Florentino Cuéllar
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
The petition for review is granted. The issue to be briefed and argued is limited to whether the trial court erred when it refused to inform the jury at the retrial of a murder charge that defendant had been convicted of gross vehicular manslaughter in the first trial. (Compare People v. Batchelor (2014) 229 Cal.App.4th 1102, 178 Cal.Rptr.3d 28.) (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.516(a)(1).)
KRUGER, J., was absent and did not participate.
Cites, in this corpus
- People v. Batchelor E054475 · 2014-09-16