gno.law

In Re Laura Fredrika Pluma, Debtor, Laura Fredrika Pluma v. Tax Collector for the County of San Diego

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 04-55107 · 2005-10-31 · Published

In Re Laura Fredrika PLUMA, Debtor, Laura Fredrika Pluma, Appellant, v. Tax Collector for the County of San Diego, Appellee

Area
other
Panel
Atsushi W. Tashima (author), Raymond C. Fisher, Shadur

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (“BAP”), Tax Collector v. Pluma (In re Pluma), 303 B.R. 444 (9th Cir. BAP 2003), reversing the judgment of the bankruptcy court, see In re Pluma, 289 B.R. 151 (Bankr.S.D.Cal. 2003).

We affirm the judgment of the *1164 BAP for the reasons stated in its opinion, 303 B.R. 444, supra, and remand to the bankruptcy court for further proceedings.

AFFIRMED.

. We deny appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal.