James Gort v. San Diego Apartment Association, a San Diego Apartment Association Credit Checking San Diego County Apartment Association San Diego Multi Housing Corporation, San Diego Apartment Association Credit Checking San Diego Association Screening Service Info Link Doris Payne Does 1-100
- Proceeding
- appeal
- Trial court
- United States District Court for the Southern District of California
- Trial judge
- Irma E. Gonzalez (district judge)
- Outcome
- affirmed — AFFIRMED.1
- Area
- other
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
145 F.3d 1337 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
James GORT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. San Diego Apartment Association, a San Diego apartment association credit checking; San Diego County Apartment Association; San Diego Multi Housing Corporation, San Diego Apartment Association Credit Checking; San Diego Association Screening Service; Info Link; Doris Payne; Does 1-100 Defendants-Appellees.
No. 97-56154.
D.C. No. CV-95-01081-IEG.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 14, 1998**.
Decided May 18, 1998.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Irma E. Gonzalez, District Judge, Presiding.
Before SCHROEDER, TROTT and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.
1 MEMORANDUM* 2 We agree with the district court that the San Diego Apartment Association is not a consumer reporting agency subject to the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1681g, or Cal. Civ.Code § 1785.15, and therefore the district court's dismissal of this action is AFFIRMED.1 ** The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3 1 Appellee's motion for judicial notice is denied