United States v. Angel Lopez-Gutierrez, AKA Ricardo Cortez-Meza
- Proceeding
- appeal
- Trial court
- United States District Court for the Southern District of California
- Outcome
- vacated — VACATED and REMANDED.
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
116 F.3d 486 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Angel LOPEZ-GUTIERREZ, aka Ricardo Cortez-Meza, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 96-50563.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 17, 1997** Decided June 20, 1997.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, D.C. No. CR-96-01672-1-GT; Gordon Thompson, Jr., District Judge, Presiding.
Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM* In light of United States v. Fuentes-Barahona, 111 F.3d 651 (9th Cir.1997), we vacate the sentence under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(2) and remand for resentencing.
VACATED and REMANDED.
** The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3