Kroessler v. CVS Health Corp.
James KROESSLER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. CVS HEALTH CORPORATION
- Proceeding
- district
- Area
- civil
Analysis
The court reviewed a motion to dismiss a consumer fraud complaint regarding CVS Health Glucosamine products. The court dismissed the claim, finding that no amendment could cure the deficiency.
| What the court decided | The model |
|---|---|
Dismissal of the consumer fraud claim with leave to amend denied.“The Court does not find that any amendment to this claim could possibly cure the deficiency.” | unsure The order recites the legal standard for denying leave to amend (that no consistent facts could cure the deficiency) but does not recite the specific factual or legal deficiency in the plaintiff's complaint that led to this conclusion. Without knowing the underlying defect (e.g., failure to state a claim, lack of standing, or failure to plead reliance), it is impossible to determine if the dismissal was legally correct. |
The order itself: sound with gaps — The order is a fragment that only addresses the denial of leave to amend. It fails to state the underlying basis for the dismissal (e.g., Rule 12(b)(6) failure to state a claim). While the citation to Schreiber is correct for the futility standard, the order does not explain why the deficiency was incurable, making the reasoning incomplete and the result unverifiable from the text provided.
How this analysis was made · dispute it
inconsistent with cited authorityOpinion
2 The CVS Health Glucosamine products at issue include the following variations: (1) CVS Health Glucosamine Chondroitin Tablets; (2) CVS Health Glucosamine Chondroitin Capsules; (3) CVS Health Glucosamine Maximum Strength Tablets; (4) CVS Health Glucosamine MSM Caplets; (5) CVS Health Glucosamine Chondroitin with MSM Tablets; (6) CVS Health Glucosamine Chondroitin with Vitamin D Caplets. [Id. at ¶ 14.]
3 Each of the CVS Health Glucosamine Products contains 1500mg of glucosamine. However, some of the Products in issue contain other primary ingredients in combination with glucosamine. [Doc. No. 1 at ¶¶ 15-16; Doc. No. 1 at note 1-6.]
4 For purposes of this Order, the Representations are only in reference to the statements on the Glucosamine Chondroitin Tablets product that Plaintiff viewed and relied upon.
5 Plaintiff preliminarily avers other states with similar consumer fraud laws under the facts of this case include, but are not limited to: Florida (Fla. Stat. §§ 501.201, et seq. ); Illinois (815 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. §§ 505/1, et seq. ); Massachusetts (Mass. Gen. Laws Ch. 93A, et seq. ); Michigan (Mich. Comp. Laws §§ 445.901, et seq. ); Minnesota (Minn. Stat. §§ 325F.67, et seq. ); Missouri (Mo. Rev. Stat. §§ 407.010, et seq. ); New Jersey (N.J. Stat. §§ 56:8-1, et seq. ); New York (N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law §§ 349 ), et seq. ; and Washington (Wash. Rev. Code §§ 19.86.010, et seq. ) (collectively, the "Class States").
6 The Court does not find that any amendment to this claim could possibly cure the deficiency. As a general rule, a court freely grants leave to amend a complaint which has been dismissed. Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a). However, leave to amend may be denied when "the court determines that the allegation of other facts consistent with the challenged pleading could not possibly cure the deficiency." Schreiber Distrib. Co. v. Serv-Well Furniture Co., Inc. , 806 F.2d 1393, 1401 (9th Cir. 1986) (citing Bonanno v. Thomas , 309 F.2d 320, 322 (9th Cir. 1962) ).
--------