Randall Buckley v. Countrywide Home Loans Inc
- Proceeding
- appeal
- Trial court
- United States District Court for the Southern District of California
- Trial judge
- Dana M. Sabraw (district judge)
- Outcome
- affirmed — AFFIRMED.
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JAN 20 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RANDALL D. BUCKLEY, an individual No. 10-56180 man, D.C. No. 3:09-cv-00064-DMS- Plaintiff - Appellant, WMC v. COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS INC, a ORDER New York corporation and COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from The United States District Court for the Southern District of California Dana M. Sabraw, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted January 9, 2012 Pasadena, California Before: REINHARDT and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and BREYER*, District Judge.* * The Honorable Charles R. Breyer, U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.
** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. On the assumption that changes to the initial written disclosures were routinely made orally, we affirm without prejudice the district court’s decision denying class certification. The District Court may, however, wish to conduct further proceedings regarding the actual practice of Countrywide, including whether logs were kept of calls relating to such changes, and may permit plaintiff to conduct further discovery toward that end.
AFFIRMED.