gno.law

United States v. Adolfo Gonzales-Padilla

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 11-50073 · 2011-12-20 · Unpublished

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Adolfo GONZALES-PADILLA, Defendant—Appellant

Area
other
Panel
Alfred T. Goodwin (author), William T. Wallace, Mary M. McKeown

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 20 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-50073 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:10-cr-04452-JLS-1 v. MEMORANDUM * ADOLFO GONZALES-PADILLA, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Janis L. Sammartino, District Judge, Presiding Submitted December 19, 2011 ** Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

Adolfo Gonzales-Padilla appeals his conviction by guilty plea and sentence for being a deported alien found in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The district court denied defendant’s request for an extension of time to file an appeal of his sentence because he failed to establish excusable neglect. See Fed.

R. App. P. 4(b). Gonzales-Padilla does not challenge this finding. Accordingly, we dismiss for lack of a timely notice of appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

DISMISSED.

2 11-50073