Concepcion Carrillo v. Eric Holder, Jr.
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FILED CONCEPCION CARRILLO, No. 09-73777 DEC 01 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK Petitioner, Agency No. A076-804-563 C O U R T OF APPE ALS U .S.
v. ORDER AMENDING ERIC H. HOLDER JR., Attorney General, MEMORANDUM Respondent.
Before: GRABER and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges, and BENITEZ,* District Judge.
The memorandum disposition filed June 21, 2011, is amended as follows:
On page 2, last paragraph, lines 1-2, change "In light of our decision in Carrillo de Palacios v. Holder, No. 09-72059, filed this date," to "In light of our decision in Carrillo de Palacios v. Holder, No. 09-72059, filed simultaneously with this amended memorandum disposition,".
The filing of a petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc shall remain due within 14 days after the mandate issues in Garfias-Rodriguez v. Holder, No.
09-72603.
* The Honorable Roger T. Benitez, United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation.