gno.law

Ex parte O'Brien

California Supreme Court · Crim. No. 255 · 1897-03-05 · Published · 5 Cal. Unrep. 625 · 48 P. 71

Ex Parte O'BRIEN

Area
other
Panel
William H. Beatty (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Beatty

BEATTY, C. J.

In this proceeding the order of the superior court amending the original decree in the case of O’Brien v. O’Brien is conclusive upon me, and the decree as amended shows that the question of alimony was reserved. This being so, the subsequent order or supplemental decree awarding alimony is not void, and the court did not exceed its jurisdiction in imprisoning the petitioner for his refusal to pay the sums decreed to be paid. The prisoner is remanded.