People ex rel. Wirt v. Budd
PEOPLE ex rel. WIRT v. BUDD
- Outcome
- dismissed — Dismissed.
- Area
- criminal
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
This is an application, on notice, for a peremptory writ of mandate to the governor of California to appoint two police commissioners for the city and county of San Francisco. The attorney general moves to dismiss the proceeding, upon the ground that the relator has received no authority to sue in the name of the people of the state, and that he is not himself a party beneficially interested (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 1086), in any sense that distinguishes *573him from other citizens of the state. The grounds of the motion are conceded, and the motion must he granted: Linden v. Supervisors, 45 Cal. 6; Ashe v. Supervisors, 71 Cal. 236, 16 Pac. 783; Colnon v. Orr, 71 Cal. 43, 11 Pac. 814; Marini v. Graham, 67 Cal. 130, 7 Pac. 442. Proceeding dismissed.
Cites, in this corpus
- Ashe v. Board of Supervisors No. 11481 · 1886-10-29
- Colnon v. Orr No. 11467 · 1886-09-21
- Marini v. Graham No. 8718 · 1885-06-23
- Linden v. Board of Supervisors No. 3,580 · 1872-07-01