gno.law

Thrift v. Plank

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 665 · 1967-10-18 · Published · 255 Cal. App. 2d 927 · 63 Cal. Rptr. 161

INVESTORS THRIFT, and v. IRVIN E. PLANK, and

Area
civil
Panel
Stone (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Stone

STONE, J.

This is a companion case to Investors Thrift v. AMA Corp., ante, page 205 [63 Cal.Rptr. 157], Although the cases were tried separately, they have been presented jointly on appeal since the contentions in each ease are the same.

The same contract is presented to the court for interpretation in each case, and the questions of law are identical.

Upon the authority of and for the reasons stated in Investors Thrift v. AMA Corp., supra, the order from which this appeal was taken is affirmed.

Conley, P. J., and Gargano, J., concurred.

Cites, in this corpus