People v. Langdon

California Court of Appeal · Crim. No. 13473 · 1967-05-01 · Published · 250 Cal. App. 2d 595 · 58 Cal. Rptr. 546 · 1967 Cal. App. LEXIS 2143

THE PEOPLE, and v. HAROLD ALMUS LANGDON, and

Area: criminal

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

THE COURT.

Appellant is attempting to appeal from an order of the superior court denying his motion to vacate the judgment. The record shows that the judgment was affirmed by the Supreme Court of California, People v. Langdon, 52 Cal.2d 425 [341 P.2d 303], The superior court was without jurisdiction. (Pen. Code, § 1265.) The order of the superior court is not appealable, and the record on appeal should not have been prepared.

The appeal is dismissed.

Cites, in this corpus

People v. Langdon Crim. 6391 · 1959-06-26

Cited by

Gilliam v. Municipal Court Civ. 55933 · 1979-10-16
People v. Langdon Crim. No. 13473 · 1967-05-01