gno.law

People v. Boyd

California Court of Appeal · Crim. No. 7859 · 1964-07-29 · Published · 228 Cal. App. 2d 844 · 39 Cal. Rptr. 693 · 1964 Cal. App. LEXIS 1149

THE PEOPLE, and v. HAYES BOYD, and

Area
criminal
Panel
Wood (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Wood

WOOD, P. J.

The judgments of the trial court in the two cases involved herein, made on June 7, 1961 (upon verdict finding defendant guilty on two counts of unlawfully selling marijuana, and upon order revoking probation), were affirmed by this court in an opinion filed on May 8, 1962. (People v. Boyd, 203 Cal.App.2d 348 [21 Cal.Rptr. 444].) Thereafter, pursuant to the decision in Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 [83 S.Ct. 814, 9 L.Ed.2d 811], and on a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, this court recalled the remittitur herein, vacated the judgment of May 8, 1962, and appointed Mr. Raymond Gloozman as counsel for defendant. (The defendant had appeared previously in propria persona.)

The facts of the eases and the contentions on appeal are stated in the former opinion. No useful purpose will be served by repeating what was said therein, and this court adopts, by reference, as its opinion herein the former opinion in People v. Boyd, 203 Cal.App.2d 348 [21 Cal.Rptr. 444].

The judgments are affirmed.

Fourt, J., and Lillie, J., concurred.

Cites, in this corpus

Cited by