gno.law

People v. Bracken

California Court of Appeal · Crim. No. 9260 · 1963-09-30 · Published · 220 Cal. App. 2d 926 · 34 Cal. Rptr. 71 · 1963 Cal. App. LEXIS 2331

THE PEOPLE, and v. BERTHA LEE BRACKEN, and

Area
criminal
Panel
W T. Fox (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Fox

FOX, P. J.

This case comes to us from the Appellate Department of the Los Angeles Superior Court. It is in the identical procedural posture as People v. Randazzo, ante, p. 768 [34 Cal.Rptr. 65] filed this date, and involves the precise legal question decided in that case. Upon the grounds and for the reasons stated in Randazzo, the order and judgment from which the People have appealed are reversed.

Ashburn, J., and Herndon, J., concurred.

A petition for a rehearing was denied October 28, 1963, and respondent’s petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied November 27, 1963. Peters, J., and Tobriner, J., were of the opinion that the petition should be granted.

Cites, in this corpus