Clinton v. International Organization of Masters, Mates & Pilots
RICHARD H. CLINTON, and v. INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF MASTERS, MATES AND PILOTS, and
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Louis H. Burke (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Burke
BURKE, P. J.
This is an appeal from the order made November 1, 1961, “Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsidering the Court’s Order of Dismissal of the Petition and Complaint.” The order dismissing the action was made October 20, 1961, in response to a motion of defendants International Organization of Masters, Mates and Pilots, West Coast Local No. 90 and Robert E. Durkin. The ground of the motion for reconsideration was judicial error—the dismissal had eliminated indispensable parties—; no fact not available upon the hearing of the motion to dismiss was presented. The order denying the motion to reconsider, under such circumstances, is not an appealable order. (Hunt v. United Artists Studio Inc., 79 Cal.App.2d 619, 626 [180 P.2d 460].)
The appeal is dismissed.
Jefferson, J., and Bishop, J. pro tem.,* concurred.
Appellant’s petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied April 9, 1963.
Retired judge of the superior court sitting pro tempore under as signment by the Chairman of the Judicial Council.
Cites, in this corpus
- Hunt v. United Artists Studio Inc. Civ. 15659 · 1947-05-12
Cited by
- Worth v. Asiatic Transpacific, Inc. Civ. 41213 · 1979-06-07
- Lavrischeff v. Blumer Civ. 41293 · 1978-02-06
- Clinton v. Joshua Hendy Corp. Civ. 29894 · 1966-08-12