gno.law

People v. Vice

California Court of Appeal · Crim. No. 3172 · 1961-05-12 · Published · 192 Cal. App. 2d 98 · 13 Cal. Rptr. 366 · 1961 Cal. App. LEXIS 1912

THE PEOPLE v. EDDIE VICE

Area
criminal
Panel
Van Dyke (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Dyke

VAN DYKE, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered upon a jury’s verdict which found appellant guilty of a sale of marijuana in violation of section 11531 of the Health and Safety Code.

Pursuant to appellant’s request for counsel this court appointed John H. Laugenour, Esq., to represent him on *99appeal. Mr. Laugenour has advised this court that in his opinion the appeal is devoid of merit. After an independent review of the record we have reached the same conclusion.

A police officer testified that he purchased the marijuana, which was introduced in evidence, from appellant. That evidence was sufficient to support the verdict notwithstanding appellant’s testimony in conflict therewith. There were no errors of law and the jury was fully and correctly instructed.

The judgment is affirmed.

Peek, J., and Schottky, J., concurred.

Cited by