Robinson v. Robinson
ALPHERIES A. ROBINSON v. RITA ROBINSON
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- John T. Nourse (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Nourse
NOURSE, J. pro tem.* Rita Robinson, defendant in an action pending in the respondent court entitled “Alpheries A. *548Robinson versus Rita Robinson, et al.” appeals from the interlocutory decree of partition and petitions this court for a writ of supersedeas.
An appeal having been perfected from an interlocutory decree of partition, all proceedings upon that decree are stayed under the provisions of section 949, Code of Civil Procedure, and there is therefore no reason for this court to stay proceedings. On the authority of Williams v. Wells Fargo Bank & U. Trust Co., 17 Cal.2d 104 [109 P.2d 649], the petition is denied and the order to show cause heretofore issued is discharged.
Vallée, Acting P. J., and Ford, J., concurred.
Assigned by Chairman of Judicial Council.
Cites, in this corpus
- Williams v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co. Sac. 5404 · 1941-01-27
Cited by
- Robinson v. Robinson Civ. No. 25392 · 1962-02-28