People v. Anderson
THE PEOPLE v. ALEX SAMUEL ANDERSON
- Area
- criminal
- Panel
- Van Dyke (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Dyke
VAN DYKE, P. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered upon a plea of guilty to a charge of sodomy, a violation of section 286 of the Penal Code.
Upon appellant’s request for counsel this court appointed James E. Harris, Esquire, of Sacramento, to represent appellant.-Mr. Harris has advised the court that he finds no merit in the appeal and that appellant has asked that he “discontinue the case. ’ ’ Nevertheless, we have made an independent review of the record and find no ground for reversal.
The judgment is affirmed.
Schottky, J., and Warne, J. pro tem.,* concurred.
Assigned by Chairman of Judicial Council.
Cited by
- People v. Anderson Crim. No. 3091 · 1970-09-03