People v. Harrison
THE PEOPLE v. JACK M. HARRISON
- Area
- criminal
- Panel
- Daniel R. Shoemaker (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Shoemaker
SHOEMAKER, J.
For the reasons stated in People v. Harrison, 182 Cal.App.2d 758 [6 Cal.Rptr. 345], the order denying appellant’s motion for new trial is affirmed.
Kaufman, P. J., and Draper, J., concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- People v. Harrison Crim. 3760 · 1960-07-18