Standard Radio & Television Co. v. Chronicle Publishing Co.
STANDARD RADIO AND TELEVISION COMPANY (a Corporation) v. THE CHRONICLE PUBLISHING COMPANY (a Corporation)
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Stone (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Stone
STONE, J. pro tem.
This is a companion case to Standard Radio and Television Company v. The Chronicle Publishing Company, ante, p. 293 [6 Cal.Rptr. 246], 1 Civ. 18222. Defendants moved the court for a change of venue from Santa Clara County to the City and County of San Francisco. The motion was denied and defendants filed this appeal.
Since we have concluded in 1 Civ. 18222 that the state court does not have jurisdiction over the subject matter of the litigation, this appeal is now moot. It is therefore dismissed.
Kaufman, P. J., and Draper, J., concurred.
Appellants’ petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied August 24, 1960.
Cites, in this corpus
- Standard Radio & Television Co. v. Chronicle Publishing Co. Civ. 18222 · 1960-06-29