gno.law

Blumenthal v. Municipal Court

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 23989 · 1959-12-23 · Published · 176 Cal. App. 2d 865 · 1 Cal. Rptr. 757 · 1959 Cal. App. LEXIS 1556

HERMAN BLUMENTHAL v. MUNICIPAL COURT OF THE CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS

Area
civil
Panel
John Shea, Tern

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Sheatern

SHEA, J. pro tern.* Petitioner seeks to prohibit further proceedings in the respondent court. He challenges the constitutionality of the statute under which he is charged. After his motion to dismiss was denied by the municipal court, on June 18,1959, he petitioned the superior court for a writ of prohibition. In that petition he raised the same issue that is presented in his petition before this court. The petition was denied by the superior court.

This presents the same situation that was before this court in Lambert v. Municipal Court, 174 Cal.App.2d 601 [345 P.2d 98], The rule of that ease is decisive here.

The alternative writ heretofore issued is discharged and the petition is denied.

Fourt, Acting P. J., and Lillie, J., concurred.

A petition for a rehearing was denied January 19, 1960, and petitioner’s application for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied February 17, ■ 1960. White, J., did not participate therein.

Assigned by Chairman of Judicial Council.

Cites, in this corpus

Cited by