gno.law

Prentice-Hall, Inc. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 18762 · 1959-10-30 · Published · 175 Cal. App. 2d 903 · 345 P.2d 527

PRENTICE-HALL, INC. (a Corporation) v. SUPERIOR COURT OF MARIN COUNTY, Respondent THE PEOPLE, Real Party in Interest

Area
civil
Panel
Mathew Tobriner (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Tobriner

TOBRINER, J.

The petition of Prentice-Hall for writ of prohibition to restrain the superior court from proceeding further upon the indictment returned against it raises the same factual matters and issues as have been previously discussed in the decisions in Davis v. Superior Court, No. 18759, ante, p. 8 [345 P.2d 513], and Longstreth v. Superior Court, No. 18760, ante, p. 27 [345 P.2d 525] decided this day.

For the reasons stated in those opinions, we have concluded that the indictment fails.

Let a peremptory writ of prohibition issue.

Bray, P. J., and Wood (Fred B.), J., concurred.

A petition for a rehearing was denied November 25, 1959, and the petition of the Real Party in Interest for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied December 23, 1959.

Cites, in this corpus