Housing Authority v. All Persons
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO v. ALL PERSONS, Defendants ESTELLE LATTA
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Absalom F. Bray (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Bray
BRAY, P. J.
Defendant Estelle Latta, purporting to act for herself and others, appeals from a judgment on the pleadings in favor of plaintiff.
Except as to the name of the plaintiff, the complaint and answer are identical with those in Universal Land Co. v. All Persons, Number 18579, this day decided {ante, p. 739 [342 P.2d 958]). Plaintiff moved for judgment on the pleadings on the grounds that said answer did not set up a ground of defense and showed laches.
As the questions presented are identical with those in case Number 18579, it is unnecessary to discuss them here. Upon the authority of that case, the judgment is affirmed.
Wood (Fred B.), J., and Tobriner, J., concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- Universal Land Co. v. All Persons Civ. 18579 · 1959-08-10